Difference between revisions of "Talk:Races"

From Seven Pillars
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 69: Line 69:
  
 
>>EDIT [[User:Whinehurst|Whinehurst]] ([[User talk:Whinehurst|talk]]) 10:09, 14 November 2014 (PST) THIS IS OUR FINAL FORM(?)
 
>>EDIT [[User:Whinehurst|Whinehurst]] ([[User talk:Whinehurst|talk]]) 10:09, 14 November 2014 (PST) THIS IS OUR FINAL FORM(?)
 +
 +
:It looks good to me. I think this is a fair compromise. --[[User:Wintermute27|Wintermute27]] ([[User talk:Wintermute27|talk]]) 16:06, 14 November 2014 (PST)
  
 
I would try to stick as close to the model presented in the offical [http://paizo.com/pathfinderRPG/prd/advancedRaceGuide/featuredRaces/ifrits.html Paizo Pathfinder SRD] as it is clean and readable. I also think it's good practice to use indents only sparingly. --[[User:Whinehurst|Whinehurst]] ([[User talk:Whinehurst|talk]]) 09:50, 13 November 2014 (PST)
 
I would try to stick as close to the model presented in the offical [http://paizo.com/pathfinderRPG/prd/advancedRaceGuide/featuredRaces/ifrits.html Paizo Pathfinder SRD] as it is clean and readable. I also think it's good practice to use indents only sparingly. --[[User:Whinehurst|Whinehurst]] ([[User talk:Whinehurst|talk]]) 09:50, 13 November 2014 (PST)

Revision as of 17:06, 14 November 2014

Okay I tried to organize the races by populations into largest, mediumest and smallest - we should also add whatever races are in the world but not a "core" race, and figure out their role in the world. --Whinehurst (talk)


What's an Alepokin? --Spookyhappyfun (talk) 12:00, 12 November 2014 (PST)

that's mike's furry fetish Kitsune (fox people) replacement. They weren't introduced in-game though; but then neither were the Summus so I'm not sure if they're cannon or not. --Whinehurst (talk) 09:32, 13 November 2014 (PST)
We discussed them at the beginning and no one vetoed them. --Wintermute27 (talk) 12:18, 13 November 2014 (PST)

Race page 'template'

some minor adjustments to Mike's (UPDATED)

== About Race ==
Description

==== Physical Description ====
Description

==== Society ====
Description

==== Relations ====
Description

==== Alignment and Faith ====
Description

==== Adventurers ====
Description

:'''Male Names:''' List

:'''Female Names:''' List

== Racial Traits ==
* '''Ability Scores:''' Description
* '''Type:''' Description
* '''Size:''' Description
* '''Speed:''' Description.
* '''Languages:''' Description

==== Defense Traits ====
* '''Name:''' Description

==== Feat and Skill Traits ====
* '''Name:''' Description

==== Magical Traits ====
* '''Name:''' Description

==== Movement Traits ====
* '''Name:''' Description

==== Offense Traits ====
* '''Name:''' Description

==== Senses Traits ====
* '''Name:''' Description

==== Weakness Traits ====
* '''Name:''' Description

==== Other Traits ====
* '''Name:''' Description

[[Category:Races]]

>>EDIT Whinehurst (talk) 10:09, 14 November 2014 (PST) THIS IS OUR FINAL FORM(?)

It looks good to me. I think this is a fair compromise. --Wintermute27 (talk) 16:06, 14 November 2014 (PST)

I would try to stick as close to the model presented in the offical Paizo Pathfinder SRD as it is clean and readable. I also think it's good practice to use indents only sparingly. --Whinehurst (talk) 09:50, 13 November 2014 (PST)

I was borrowing the formatting of the d20pfsrd website as seen here which I find a little easier to read and the categories of traits comes from the Advanced Race Guide. --Wintermute27 (talk) 12:18, 13 November 2014 (PST)
Yeah i know, i just don't think it's as clean looking; it's mostly an aesthetic choice, i just think it's strange to have subheadings with only two lines underthem --Whinehurst (talk) 13:03, 13 November 2014 (PST)
I updated the Kobold page to incorporate some of the changes. I cut back on the indenting and went to a bulleted list of traits. IS that more of what you were looking for? --Wintermute27 (talk) 16:26, 13 November 2014 (PST)
I think it looks cleaner like that; especially cutting the indents; they were superfluous i think. I know the d20pfsrd uses the independent headings for racial trait categories, but in my opinion they're not really needed here - but that's just a matter of taste. The way i formatted the Ifrit page is my preference... I guess we'll hash it out in the arena --Whinehurst (talk) 17:52, 13 November 2014 (PST)