Difference between revisions of "Talk:Races"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Whinehurst (talk | contribs) |
Whinehurst (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
[[Category:Races]]</nowiki> | [[Category:Races]]</nowiki> | ||
| − | >> | + | >>EDIT [[User:Whinehurst|Whinehurst]] ([[User talk:Whinehurst|talk]]) 10:09, 14 November 2014 (PST) THIS IS OUR FINAL FORM(?) |
| + | |||
I would try to stick as close to the model presented in the offical [http://paizo.com/pathfinderRPG/prd/advancedRaceGuide/featuredRaces/ifrits.html Paizo Pathfinder SRD] as it is clean and readable. I also think it's good practice to use indents only sparingly. --[[User:Whinehurst|Whinehurst]] ([[User talk:Whinehurst|talk]]) 09:50, 13 November 2014 (PST) | I would try to stick as close to the model presented in the offical [http://paizo.com/pathfinderRPG/prd/advancedRaceGuide/featuredRaces/ifrits.html Paizo Pathfinder SRD] as it is clean and readable. I also think it's good practice to use indents only sparingly. --[[User:Whinehurst|Whinehurst]] ([[User talk:Whinehurst|talk]]) 09:50, 13 November 2014 (PST) | ||
Revision as of 10:09, 14 November 2014
Okay I tried to organize the races by populations into largest, mediumest and smallest - we should also add whatever races are in the world but not a "core" race, and figure out their role in the world. --Whinehurst (talk)
What's an Alepokin? --Spookyhappyfun (talk) 12:00, 12 November 2014 (PST)
- that's mike's
furry fetishKitsune (fox people) replacement. They weren't introduced in-game though; but then neither were the Summus so I'm not sure if they're cannon or not. --Whinehurst (talk) 09:32, 13 November 2014 (PST)
- We discussed them at the beginning and no one vetoed them. --Wintermute27 (talk) 12:18, 13 November 2014 (PST)
Race page 'template'
some minor adjustments to Mike's (UPDATED)
== About Race == Description ==== Physical Description ==== Description ==== Society ==== Description ==== Relations ==== Description ==== Alignment and Faith ==== Description ==== Adventurers ==== Description :'''Male Names:''' List :'''Female Names:''' List == Racial Traits == * '''Ability Scores:''' Description * '''Type:''' Description * '''Size:''' Description * '''Speed:''' Description. * '''Languages:''' Description ==== Defense Traits ==== * '''Name:''' Description ==== Feat and Skill Traits ==== * '''Name:''' Description ==== Magical Traits ==== * '''Name:''' Description ==== Movement Traits ==== * '''Name:''' Description ==== Offense Traits ==== * '''Name:''' Description ==== Senses Traits ==== * '''Name:''' Description ==== Weakness Traits ==== * '''Name:''' Description ==== Other Traits ==== * '''Name:''' Description [[Category:Races]]
>>EDIT Whinehurst (talk) 10:09, 14 November 2014 (PST) THIS IS OUR FINAL FORM(?)
I would try to stick as close to the model presented in the offical Paizo Pathfinder SRD as it is clean and readable. I also think it's good practice to use indents only sparingly. --Whinehurst (talk) 09:50, 13 November 2014 (PST)
- I was borrowing the formatting of the d20pfsrd website as seen here which I find a little easier to read and the categories of traits comes from the Advanced Race Guide. --Wintermute27 (talk) 12:18, 13 November 2014 (PST)
- Yeah i know, i just don't think it's as clean looking; it's mostly an aesthetic choice, i just think it's strange to have subheadings with only two lines underthem --Whinehurst (talk) 13:03, 13 November 2014 (PST)
- I updated the Kobold page to incorporate some of the changes. I cut back on the indenting and went to a bulleted list of traits. IS that more of what you were looking for? --Wintermute27 (talk) 16:26, 13 November 2014 (PST)
- I think it looks cleaner like that; especially cutting the indents; they were superfluous i think. I know the d20pfsrd uses the independent headings for racial trait categories, but in my opinion they're not really needed here - but that's just a matter of taste. The way i formatted the Ifrit page is my preference... I guess we'll hash it out in the arena --Whinehurst (talk) 17:52, 13 November 2014 (PST)
