Talk:Races

Okay I tried to organize the races by populations into largest, mediumest and smallest - we should also add whatever races are in the world but not a "core" race, and figure out their role in the world. --Whinehurst (talk)

---

What's an Alepokin? --Spookyhappyfun (talk) 12:00, 12 November 2014 (PST)

that's mike's furry fetish Kitsune (fox people) replacement. They weren't introduced in-game though; but then neither were the Summus so I'm not sure if they're cannon or not. --Whinehurst (talk) 09:32, 13 November 2014 (PST)

We discussed them at the beginning and no one vetoed them. --Wintermute27 (talk) 12:18, 13 November 2014 (PST)

Race page 'template'

some minor adjustments to Mike's

== About Race ==
Description

==== Physical Description ====
Description

==== Society ====
Description

==== Relations ====
Description

==== Alignment and Faith ====
Description

==== Adventurers ====
Description

:'''Male Names:''' List

:'''Female Names:''' List

== Racial Traits ==
'''Ability Scores:''' Description

'''Type:''' Description

'''Size:''' Description

'''Speed:''' Description

'''Languages:''' Description

<!-- Add additional traits as needed, ie. spell-like abilities, darkvision, ect. -->

'''Name:''' Description

'''Name:''' Description

'''Name:''' Description

[[Category:Races]]

I would try to stick as close to the model presented in the offical Paizo Pathfinder SRD as it is clean and readable. I also think it's good practice to use indents only sparingly. --Whinehurst (talk) 09:50, 13 November 2014 (PST)

I was borrowing the formatting of the d20pfsrd website as seen here which I find a little easier to read and the categories of traits comes from the Advanced Race Guide. --Wintermute27 (talk) 12:18, 13 November 2014 (PST)

Yeah i know, i just don't think it's as clean looking; it's mostly an aesthetic choice, i just think it's strange to have subheadings with only two lines underthem --Whinehurst (talk) 13:03, 13 November 2014 (PST)

I updated the Kobold page to incorporate some of the changes. I cut back on the indenting and went to a bulleted list of traits. IS that more of what you were looking for? --Wintermute27 (talk) 16:26, 13 November 2014 (PST)

I think it looks cleaner like that; especially cutting the indents; they were superfluous i think. I know the d20pfsrd uses the independent headings for racial trait categories, but in my opinion they're not really needed here - but that's just a matter of taste. The way i formatted the Ifrit page is my preference... I guess we'll hash it out in the arena --Whinehurst (talk) 17:52, 13 November 2014 (PST)