Talk:Races
Revision as of 13:03, 13 November 2014 by Whinehurst (talk | contribs)
Okay I tried to organize the races by populations into largest, mediumest and smallest - we should also add whatever races are in the world but not a "core" race, and figure out their role in the world. --Whinehurst (talk)
What's an Alepokin? --Spookyhappyfun (talk) 12:00, 12 November 2014 (PST)
- that's mike's
furry fetishKitsune (fox people) replacement. They weren't introduced in-game though; but then neither were the Summus so I'm not sure if they're cannon or not. --Whinehurst (talk) 09:32, 13 November 2014 (PST)
- We discussed them at the beginning and no one vetoed them. --Wintermute27 (talk) 12:18, 13 November 2014 (PST)
Race page 'template'
some minor adjustments to Mike's
== About Race == Description ==== Physical Description ==== Description ==== Society ==== Description ==== Relations ==== Description ==== Alignment and Faith ==== Description ==== Adventurers ==== Description :'''Male Names:''' List :'''Female Names:''' List == Racial Traits == '''Ability Scores:''' Description '''Type:''' Description '''Size:''' Description '''Speed:''' Description '''Languages:''' Description <!-- Add additional traits as needed, ie. spell-like abilities, darkvision, ect. --> '''Name:''' Description '''Name:''' Description '''Name:''' Description [[Category:Races]]
I would try to stick as close to the model presented in the offical Paizo Pathfinder SRD as it is clean and readable. I also think it's good practice to use indents only sparingly. --Whinehurst (talk) 09:50, 13 November 2014 (PST)
- I was borrowing the formatting of the d20pfsrd website as seen here which I find a little easier to read and the categories of traits comes from the Advanced Race Guide. --Wintermute27 (talk) 12:18, 13 November 2014 (PST)
- Yeah i know, i just don't think it's as clean looking; it's mostly an aesthetic choice, i just think it's strange to have subheadings with only two lines underthem --Whinehurst (talk) 13:03, 13 November 2014 (PST)
