Difference between revisions of "Talk:Terausian History"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I'm going to start the discussion page here as a good place to talk about the selection of dates in the Timeline. | I'm going to start the discussion page here as a good place to talk about the selection of dates in the Timeline. | ||
− | I'll go first: I think the events of 1111 should be split up, with smithing advances in 1111, the Trueforge in 1250-ish, and artifice magic in 1320-ish. As long as we stay within the 500 year window, we can space and rearrange events however we like. | + | I'll go first: I think the events of 1111 should be split up, with smithing advances in 1111, the Trueforge in 1250-ish, and artifice magic in 1320-ish. As long as we stay within the 500 year window, we can space and rearrange events however we like. - Mike |
---- | ---- | ||
And here's where Jason comes in and agrees and says 'I like that idea.' I like that idea. My question, though, is what's going on with the order of the dates. It looks like it starts at 1 and goes up to 1124, then the next date is 1028. Was that a typo or are they just not all in order? --[[User:Spookyhappyfun|Spookyhappyfun]] ([[User talk:Spookyhappyfun|talk]]) 10:14, 12 November 2014 (PST) | And here's where Jason comes in and agrees and says 'I like that idea.' I like that idea. My question, though, is what's going on with the order of the dates. It looks like it starts at 1 and goes up to 1124, then the next date is 1028. Was that a typo or are they just not all in order? --[[User:Spookyhappyfun|Spookyhappyfun]] ([[User talk:Spookyhappyfun|talk]]) 10:14, 12 November 2014 (PST) |
Revision as of 10:14, 12 November 2014
I'm going to start the discussion page here as a good place to talk about the selection of dates in the Timeline.
I'll go first: I think the events of 1111 should be split up, with smithing advances in 1111, the Trueforge in 1250-ish, and artifice magic in 1320-ish. As long as we stay within the 500 year window, we can space and rearrange events however we like. - Mike
And here's where Jason comes in and agrees and says 'I like that idea.' I like that idea. My question, though, is what's going on with the order of the dates. It looks like it starts at 1 and goes up to 1124, then the next date is 1028. Was that a typo or are they just not all in order? --Spookyhappyfun (talk) 10:14, 12 November 2014 (PST)