Difference between revisions of "Talk:Terausian History"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I'll go first: I think the events of 1111 should be split up, with smithing advances in 1111, the Trueforge in 1250-ish, and artifice magic in 1320-ish. As long as we stay within the 500 year window, we can space and rearrange events however we like. | I'll go first: I think the events of 1111 should be split up, with smithing advances in 1111, the Trueforge in 1250-ish, and artifice magic in 1320-ish. As long as we stay within the 500 year window, we can space and rearrange events however we like. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
And here's where Jason comes in and agrees and says 'I like that idea.' I like that idea. My question, though, is what's going on with the order of the dates. It looks like it starts at 1 and goes up to 1124, then the next date is 1028. Was that a typo or are they just not all in order? --[[User:Spookyhappyfun|Spookyhappyfun]] ([[User talk:Spookyhappyfun|talk]]) 10:14, 12 November 2014 (PST) | And here's where Jason comes in and agrees and says 'I like that idea.' I like that idea. My question, though, is what's going on with the order of the dates. It looks like it starts at 1 and goes up to 1124, then the next date is 1028. Was that a typo or are they just not all in order? --[[User:Spookyhappyfun|Spookyhappyfun]] ([[User talk:Spookyhappyfun|talk]]) 10:14, 12 November 2014 (PST) | ||
Revision as of 10:14, 12 November 2014
I'm going to start the discussion page here as a good place to talk about the selection of dates in the Timeline.
I'll go first: I think the events of 1111 should be split up, with smithing advances in 1111, the Trueforge in 1250-ish, and artifice magic in 1320-ish. As long as we stay within the 500 year window, we can space and rearrange events however we like.
And here's where Jason comes in and agrees and says 'I like that idea.' I like that idea. My question, though, is what's going on with the order of the dates. It looks like it starts at 1 and goes up to 1124, then the next date is 1028. Was that a typo or are they just not all in order? --Spookyhappyfun (talk) 10:14, 12 November 2014 (PST)
